Almost all business news focused on publicly traded
companies, ends up talking about how they are forced to look at short quarterly
cycles, and that this charge to quarterly earnings has negative
consequences. Frankly, the framing
of this issue by the business media is a disservice to both businesses and the
public and, what is more…. It is not an full reflection of what is
happening.
When I have talked with executives of larger companies,
especially CEOs, they frame their focus on managing perceptions around
quarterly earnings. They are more
concerned about staying the course on longer range plans.
This may be a subtle difference to most of us and it is one
that is profound. Fleshed out,
this means that the large company CEO believe their value to their companies is
to set and maintain a long range course.
Stay with me here…. This means that when plans are set, they
are focused on letting the plan play out, rather than being reactive. They know that to stay on course, they
have to have most of their team and employees focused on executing the plan
(not on managing quarterly earnings).
There my friends is where smaller businesses are
different. Often, the
CEO/Owner/Executive Team switch back and forth from tactical to longer range
plans and too often, end up in the weeds and being reactive. One of the places that hurts a smaller
business and is too often neglected is in the CEO either focusing on shiny
objects (whatever is in front of them) OR in letting others undermine a course
that they have set.
So, what can a small business owner/CEO do to not get sucked
in to detail, where they are likely to be reactive? Am I suggesting that a small business owner should not pay
attention to cash flow , accounts receivable and the weekly/daily
activities?
What I have found and what I recommend is that you balance
and separate. First, balance how
much time you spend on day to day with focusing on what will get your company
to achieve its next set of goals.
At the same time, figure out what makes sense for you and your company….
How many hours spent on tactical and how many on longer range execution.
There are a number of ways you can separate short term from
long term. First, make arbitrary
separations. Make sure you never
mix agendas for your meetings. I
even went to the extra effort of having a break between tactical and longer
term meetings.
Next, ask yourself and your staff to always ask the question
(I mean out loud): Are we being reactive?
Is this something that needs to play out because we have a plan or is
“it” side-tracking us?
I’ll bet you have some strategies and tools you use to
separate and balance. What are
your strategies or suggestions?
No comments:
Post a Comment